trend titanium maximum security 2013 downloadsystem mechanic for windows 7 64 bit downloadulead video studio 9 download full freeskymap pro 7 download
Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 ISO available?
If here is your first visit, make sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the web link above. You may must register which causes the area post: click on the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, pick the forum that you might want to visit from your selection below.
I am repairing a damaged computer Dell Dimension E310 for the friend. The computer incorporates a severe virus/malware infestation. While organizing the virus IRP Hook your machine no longer boots Win XP MCE 2005.
I have to have a set of Win XP MCE 2005 CDs to solve the system but my mate cannot get the original disks. I do employ a license number on my pc and it turned out obviously running this system so it can be legitimate. All I need may be the original media which enables it to supply the license number.
Does anyone have a pair of WinXP MCE 2005 CDs they are able to make some ISOs to me? I would appreciate the skills.
Thanks ahead of time and possess a nice day!
Last edited by lynchaj; July 18th, 2013 at 03:25 PM.
Be aware you might not have the capacity to use the factory-supplied key that has a retail MCE 2005 - M often wouldnt allow keys from OEM installations to do business with OEM/Retail discs.
I also collect PC and C64 Sierra On-Line software!
Tacoma, Washington, USA. Zip code 98404
All he needs would be the media to recover, i ran into this by having an HP i needed to work on. The only thing they wouldnt enable you to do is upgrade from MCE to PRO, the hp always hung up and kept saying key wasnt valid. But as part of his case, you might have the ability to download the ISO from M still not really but worth a glance, since you use a legit key available, you might just look for just a torrent, download and burn it. Now moderators, im not suggesting piracy as he includes a legit key offered to him?
Thats right, I employ a legit installation which has a product key on my small friends computer. Presumably there have been original installation CDs sometime but they arent available any further. Basically I require the replacement CDs to fix this computer. Dell does possess a way to manage to get thier OEM CDs for WinXP MCE 2005 and Ive sent the link to my pal to request them.
This is just not piracy, it truly is getting the main media or replacement media to get a legitimate installation which has a product key license. If I found an ISO it'd save us some time to jumping through flaming hoops with Dell. I really require CDs simply to do a repair mode installation while on an existing install around the C: drive.
Any tips or pointers appreciated. Thanks and have a very nice day!
While it's just not what you really need to do, Dell probably will send you some free disks, theyve completed it in the past to me and just mailed the OS, drivers and PowerDVD disk totally needed PowerDVD this indicates. Heres the web link: y
Unfortunately I dont actually possess a XP MCE disk set, Ive been wanting an actual physical copy to get a while but never really found one.
Tacoma, Washington, USA. Zip code 98404
you need to just hunt for the ISO file, any somewhat respectable site may have it accessible to download since yours is legit, tthere shouldn't be problems where legalities all youre doing is finding the back of the application that youre legally eligible for.
Canton, Pennsylvania USA
I employ a copy with the disks, there was two, one contained the os plus the other the add-ons.
I will make the iso for every single one and post the hyperlink to download them, if you want.
you will need to have a valid key, Give me a couple of days.
I possess a copy in the disks, there was two, one contained the os and also the other the add-ons.
I may make the iso for each and every one and post the connection to download them, if you want.
you will desire a valid key, Give me several days.
Yes, please. I possess a product key license with this machine and will send you a picture for verification if required. This is purely a replacement in the lost media of any legal install. Maybe the master can recover the lost CDs and I certainly hope so however the computer is stuck within the bench for the moment.
I really thank you for help. I recommend in case you post over a server to keep the web link private and behind a no then it doesnt get misinterpreted by TPTB.
Thanks before hand. Have a pleasant day!
MCE2005 is simply an OEM product, so no retail key problems to concern yourself with. A Dell that new ought to have come that has a single DVD with all the MCE2005 installation. That machine might need Intel AHCI drivers to put in so employ a floppy drive handy to load the drivers from.
Most on the dells I have worked on use a restore partition unless someone wiped your entire drive. There are instructions laying around in somewhere to activate the partition restore around the dell site.
All times are GMT - 8. The time now could be 08:05 AM.
Copyright 2015 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
2002-2012 All rights reserved.
By applying this site you accept the use of cookies for analytics, personalized content and ads.
I possess a Advent 8111 laptop and I am wanting to format tough drive and reinstall Window XP Media Center Edition 2005. I got a copy in the Widows XP MCE 2005 from my IT department within my work place because they said they may download it and burn it to me fast!
but after formatting the harddrive and also the partion on my small laptop I got to typing my Product Key, which I obtained in the bottom in the laptop. The error window appeared saying The CD key you entered isn't valid and I cant use whatever other use of getting past this. I contacted Advent nevertheless they were not capable of help. What should I do next?
In respond to BenMansfield s post on July 24, 2011
Where have you download it from? Are they legal disks?
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
Perhaps there is an wrong edition of XP, there are two versions of Media Center. Then there were also touch pc, pro, and home. Check to make certain you are with all the right type.
Also, the condition could be caused when you are looking to use a retail disk compared to an OEM copy. The product keys are certainly not interchangeable. One way to determine if your license is OEM is go through the key and find out if it says OEM software or perhaps a maker like Advent.
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
What EXACTLY aside from teh Key itself does the COA sticker around the case have to say is your licensed copy of Windows?
In respond to Noel D Paton s post on July 22, 2011
The sticker around the back of my Laptop say Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 DSG Retail Limited it has some bar codes and also the Product Key.
The CDs group of two can be an burnt/downloaded copy so have no inforamtion in it.
I did observe that when installing that this title in the installation was XP Professional is that this normal?
Thanks for the help up to now!
In solution BenMansfield s post on July 24, 2011
Where have you download it from? Are they legal disks?
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
In solution Allen Howard s post on July 24, 2011
I think its at a microsoft download resource. I got one with the guys from my IT department to download an ISO in my opinion, he explained it was legitimate.
In solution BenMansfield s post on July 24, 2011
perhaps the disks are damaged, but it might be a problem using the one they downloaded being volume license and also your key OEM.
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
In answer Allen Howard s post on July 24, 2011
So you think I should get another copy downloaded?
In respond to BenMansfield s post on July 24, 2011
Yes, however it must be OEM. Make sure you request that specifically. I reread a post and also you said you have got it in the bottom with the laptop. When you spoke with advent, have you ask for system recovery disks?
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
In respond to Allen Howard s post on July 24, 2011
No i was told that to utilize partion around the harddrive to reset your computer, but I had already deleted that. Then they laughed and said to call their premium rate number to become more help, which wasnt very useful
In respond to BenMansfield s post on July 24, 2011
Id inquire further if they give you the cdsmost OEMs sell them for 20. If you may find an OEM on the tech department, then use that.
A ce, Network ce, IT for sales, CCENT Certified technician
Please use a lower page number.
Please enter only numbers.
Please get a lower page number.
Please enter only numbers.
You have Windows 10, but these pages is for the previous version of Windows. Get Windows 10 help
Windows XP support is finished. Keep your PC protected. Learn more
Hi thereyoure in search of Windows 10 info! We put that stuff in a very new spot.
Get strategies to your questions from the Windows forum.
Get help from the support professional on the phone, email, or chat.
Get techniques to your questions from the Windows7 forum.
Get help at a support professional by telephone, email, or chat.
Get strategies your questions inside the WindowsVista forum.
Get help from your support professional on the phone, email, or chat.
Get solutions to your questions from the WindowsXP forum.
Your feedback helps improve this website.
We thank you for feedback.
Get the saying out. Share this web site with your family.
Stay hold of Windows.
We thought i would follow up the last post through an FAQ which can be based for the comments and discussions, so Bernardo put this together so everything's in one place. Some of these may very well be introductory for a few but since should be genuine covered plenty of topics, it seemed reasonable to start out at the beginning. Steven
A codec is software currently in use to compress or decompress an electronic digital media file, say for example a song or video. MPEG-2 is widespread as the format of digital television signals which are broadcast by terrestrial over-the-air, cable, and direct broadcast satellite TV systems, and DVD Video. Dolby Digital will be the widely used audio standard for terrestrial ATSC, over-the-air, cable, direct broadcast satellite TV systems, and DVD Video. Dolby audio is a mandatory format in Blu-ray.
How has Windows handled DVD related decoder licensing previous to Windows 8?
The issue all around the incremental costs of codecs to learn DVDs isn t a novice to Windows. In Windows XP and Windows Vista we addressed it by specialized editions, for instance Windows Media Center Edition, or codec add-ons to Windows Media Player. DVD playback wasn't included in Windows Vista Starter, Home Basic, Business, and Windows Vista Enterprise editions. OEMs PC manufacturers had the possibility to license Windows Vista Starter, Home Basic, and Business with DVD where we offered a version that features the Dolby Digital codec make it possible for the OS to back up DVD playback for the nominal price increase. In Windows 7, we thought we would make these codecs available broadly in the majority of editions, except Windows 7 Home Basic for sale in some emerging markets and Windows 7 Starter editions accessible for netbooks and several emerging markets. That means royalties associated with DVD playback in Windows 7 happen to be paid broadly, irrespective of whether or not the PC posseses an optical drive. Based on sales and usage, we supplied codecs into a very large quantity of PCs that have been not competent at playing DVDs or perhaps did not ever play DVDs.
Who pays decoder royalties related to DVD playback on PCs?
Typically, media codecs depend on intellectual property IP, often patents, held by electronics consortiums or companies. The result is always that entities that sell items which include these codecs should pay royalties for the IP owners; sometimes into a single entity Dolby Laboratories, and quite often through a license agency MPEG-LA who administers licensing for any number of IP holders under specific terms. The rules surrounding who pays these royalties vary by licensing program. According for the MPEG-LA program, the business that ships the tip product is in charge of paying. In the situation of new PCs with Windows pre-installed, that could be the PC OEMs. The Dolby program for Windows 7 was defined based upon an agreement between Dolby and Microsoft where Microsoft has paid Dolby directly to the rights to Dolby Technologies inbuilt Windows 7. Royalties can also be paid by ISVs including those technologies inside their applications, even though those applications are bundled on new systems. This means that oftentimes the same royalties might be paid many times over for the single PC Microsoft pays some, OEM pays some, ISV pays some. In Windows 8, we shall continue to include some technologies licensed by MPEG-LA and Dolby that'll be paid by OEMs, but only the ones that relate to online media consumption MPEG-2 container for H.264, Dolby Digital Plus audio and never those related optical media. The costs related to those codecs are lower, but significant, in comparison to optical media playback. Also, Windows 8 apps will have the capacity to use these technologies as part with the Windows 8 Media Foundation APIs at no additional cost, as long when they are not providing optical media and broadcast related functionality.
How much will it cost the PC ecosystem to experience DVDs?
Playing DVDs generally require MPEG-2 video compression and Dolby Digital AC-3 audio. Even though it truly is possible make use of other formats, nearly all commercial DVDs are encoded basic formats. In order to decode these formats, the playback device should be licensed make use of these decoders. MPEG-2 decoder costs 2.00 per unit under current MPEG-LA terms. Dolby license is surely an additional cost that varies with the technology licensed, the kind of device, and unit volume. While not linked to Windows, Blu Ray could be an additional cost together with these. So whenever you add this up and pertain to all Windows PCs, it truly is an ongoing tariff of hundreds of countless dollars per year towards the PC ecosystem, above a billion dollars on the lifecycle on the operating system but by most predictions many PCs will never even be competent at playing DVDs.
When we now have DVD playback capabilities in software broadly as with Windows 7, it's impossible to distinguish if the PC is ever going to play a DVD disc but nevertheless this expense is carried on every PC. While we might think which the best solution is a sort of just on time charge time for Microsoft determined by telemetry or perhaps anytime upgrade this is just not how another-party licensing programs act as described above. So there isn t a tactic where you buy Windows or even a PC and simply pay as you go if DVD playback is provided inside box. Once it truly is distributed being a player, a license is necessary.
Will devices with Windows 8 pre-installed be capable of play DVDs out from the box?
This is ultimately an OEM option for what peripherals and software to include in a very given system. If a whole new device comes with a optical drive, it can most likely include necessary software and licenses turning it into a seamless experience on the vast majority of buyers. Similarly, an add-on optical drive internal or external will likely come with DVD playback software if you do not intentionally obtain a white label drive which could possibly be a perfectly reasonable choice when the drive is merely for loading software. In all cases, you'll find so many complete third-party applications which provide a broad selection of support that's properly licensed. On the other hand, the ecosystem won t should pay for that software and related royalties on devices including tablets, small form factor desktops, and laptops which are sold without optical drives.
What if I upgrade to Windows 8 on my own current Windows 7 PC which has a DVD drive?
If there may be existing third-party playback software the Windows Upgrade Assistant can help determine if miracle traffic bot is compatible with Windows 8 and you should have the option to hold it through the upgrade to Windows 8. Otherwise, you need to acquire third-party playback software following upgrade to experiment with DVDs. Alternatively, you'll be able to acquire the Windows 8 Media Center Pack and the Windows 8 Pro Pack post upgrade. Both Packs include Windows Media Center, such as the ability to learn DVDs.
With the evolution of device form factors tablets, thin and light-weight, etc., none which have optical drives and change in the news consumption patterns from optical disks and broadcast TV to online Netflix, Youtube, Hulu, etc., we figured we would not make DVD and broadcast TV capabilities accessible in all Windows editions, mainly because the feature applies into a decreasing variety of PCs sold. Instead, those capabilities will probably be available just to customers trying it via Add Windows Feature aka Windows Anytime Upgrade. This ensures the costs linked to playing DVDs and watching broadcast TV on PCs only pertain to devices which have those capabilities and customers that are looking for it.
The Windows 8 Pro edition which includes Media Center is going to be named and branded Windows 8 Pro. The only difference is that it's going to include Media Center and also you will also get a different string in it properties where it can say Windows 8 Pro with Media Center. This isn't a new edition of Windows 8.
Trends in Media Center usage show a decline within the number of clients that use it over a regular basis, starting at a relatively small base even as we previously blogged about. When we check out actual usage, most customers using Media Center and playing DVDs used Windows Ultimate and XP Pro/Media Center. We believe those customers may also be interested inside the additional features provided within the Windows 8 Pro edition, for example Boot from VHD, Client Hyper-V, etc., especially when they are using Media Center over a PC used in general tasks. Considering the audience and current usage, we conclude the the greater part of Media Center customers upgrading to Windows 8 will be for the Windows 8 Pro edition. In our efforts and keep the Windows 8 editions plan as elementary as possible, Windows Media Center is merely available on Windows 8 Pro. If you have Windows 8 Pro and even add Media Center, you just need to choose the additional Media Center Pack as a possible in-place upgrade available via Add Windows Features formerly Windows Anytime Upgrade.
Windows 8 Pro Pack can be an upgrade from Windows 8 to Windows 8 Pro. Like we described above, Media Center is simply available on Windows 8 Pro. When you discover the Pro Pack, we turn it into a single step that can you to Windows 8 Pro with Media Center. The cost on the Media Center Pack it's essentially built into Pro Pack. Again, this can be an attempt to add simplicity towards the process of acquiring Media Center.
The version of Media Center incorporated into Windows 8 is really what we shipped within the Windows 8 Consumer Preview. It is much in step with what shipped in Windows 7.
Will CableCard along with devices continue to utilize Media Center in Windows 8?
Yes, there's no improvement in hardware supported between Windows 7 and Windows 8.
Why doesn t Windows Media Player support DVD playback even though installing Media Center?
Based about the above discussion, it needs to be clear that people cannot enable DVD playback on a regular basis in Windows Media Player. Given the ongoing feedback to stop feature overlap and to protect yourself from the complexity of behavior changing for the previously installed component, we just enable DVD playback in Media Center once it can be installed.
If I upgrade available, can t I just utilize codecs that have been already purchased with Windows 7?
The usage rights to codecs needed to try out DVD don't carry forward to your new version of Windows when you finally upgrade. These terms are defined with the licensors of those technologies, not Microsoft or OEMs.
Update, this FAQ was added for the original post.
Please reproduce DVD by putting in the decoder for exclusive use.
Although I myself have changed to Windows 7, Windows MediaCenter is seldom used.
Windows Media Player is way better if per mp4, wmv, and flv might be reproduced as standard.
The rest thinks finished . kana which isn't so heavy.
Quick question I am not on the time capable of try the Consumer Preview: Is the modern media center a metro version, or merely the ported windows 7 desktop version? Because the immersive feel in the app could well be good in metro.
Otherwise, it is a great and informative post. Thank you
Great Post! Thanks Win8 team.
The first question with your FAQ actually has 2 questions, and also the second and what makes them not contained in Windows 8 isn t addressed within your answer.
sean sorry, merely a typo fixed. the rest from the post is around the second part.
thank you much for removing WMC. it is possible to chance we could remove WMP too. one on the first think I do when setting up a whole new windows technique is go straight away to windows features and uninstalling WMP WMC. Basically ever thing in the media features. even if it is just not my own pc I do that there a lot better alternatives for playing media files, CCC pack Windows media classic pops into your head.
Can we please add Windows 2 Go inside Pro Version. That may be the only enterprise feature I want and would actually use inside a non business related scenario. Would be considered a shame if I ought to acquire enterprises edition in other means in order to have any particular one feature.
PS I have Iconia Tab w500. He/they're right, This device dose n't need DVD playback. In fact it dose not require WMC WMP installed in any respect. Once again there are much better alternatives. The best Media play MS ever developed was version 5.0. After so it sucked no hard feeling.
Please inform me that this isn t the situation?
I mean it had been bad enough that Bluray playback had not been present in Win7, these days no DVD playback?
Is Microsoft just looking to make things tougher for users and push them away into a Apple solution?
People do NOT wish to pay more money for Bluray or DVD playback and neither if and when they. They should manage to put a disc of their player and expect it to learn.
MS. You cant be much more OUT of touch with the users than that you are today. Its time you shake your organisation up and initiate re-inventing yourselves along with your products.
1 on spending so much time to answer burning questions. I, for example, am super-excited to determine how Windows 8 will deliver a world-class audio and video entertainment experience without WMC. The team is delivering innovative, novel methods to common Windows tasks. I can t wait just for this to play out.//Jerry
Steven Sinofsky, Bernardo
I have simply no problem paying due to this feature in Windows 8. Really I don t.
All I care is actually I m paying because of this, I expect value. Windows 7 MC on W8 is just not value. A new MC. With DVD playback. With Blu-ray support. If you charge for this, then no less than put some effort into whatever you re charging for. Because you ll just sell us a somewhat modified version to operate on W8 with the W7 version.
Sell for above cost price, I don t care. Just please please please put some effort engrossed.
The ability to learn DVDs needs to be part on the Enterprise edition. As mentioned by numerous, requiring you to deploy and support/patch an extra application adds for the complexity, cost.
People keep in mind that windows XP, that s has lasted for like ever dose donrrrt you have DVD support OOBE ether. with out one bitched that.
1.6 Microsoft Plus! Digital Media Edition
1.7 Microsoft Plus! SuperPack for Windows XP
why shall we be crying over it now? If it keeps the tariff of Windows 8 Pro with the 199 mark I m all because of it. let's admit it Microsoft is about to have to hold the Retail version of windows 8 to a minimum to convince individuals upgrade and adopt the modern Metro and WinRT platform. I have a very feeling there going to ought to price low like they did with Windows ME, to get website visitors to update. If they planning to price it like they did with vista. well we are very mindful how that went from the end.
I think Price is planning to be a significant factor then some DVD codec trivial matter.
i aprrechiate the decison to take WMC, but sometimes instaed increase the WMP to seem more Metro. Also eliminate the Store function in WMP. We possess the Zune store, and then we don t demand it WMP as well as cut from the design support in WMP. Nobody make use of the Win95 designs correctly anymore.
Don t spend on Windows 8 Pro or Media Center ripoff and fatten greedy, lazy Microsoft s bank-account. Use MPC-HC for your video playback needs.
Thanks for at least which makes it an option rather than removing support altogether for Win8. What I would appreciate is support for that NZ MHEG5 format so we can easily at least view the full weeks television guide with his digital tv.
Is Windows 8 an OS built with the lowest common denominator?
Windows Aero detects my computers video capabilities and configures itself accordingly. Windows has long had the proportions to self-optimize depending on detected hardware. The start screen doesnt accomplish this. Metro doesnt do that. In addition, now DVD playback is undoubtedly an add-on feature. We have truly come full circle.
I have always used prerelease versions of windows as my primary OS since 95. I cant do by using Windows 8. I use an HP 610-1065qd touchscreen, media center, desktop as my primary computer. Keyboard and mouse are my primary input tools. When I first started employing this system I was slightly annoyed as I discovered that touch capabilities included in Windows 7 lacking. I then installed Windows 8 inside a dual boot configuration booting from VHD is really a nice feature. I learned that Windows 8 didnt cause me to feel want to drop my mouse and touch my screen. Touch, personally, is definitely an input way of last resort. The scrolling inside the start screen certainly is smoother with touch than my mouse, however, that isn't compelling enough to cause me to feel want to reach to the site touch my screen. Btw, my screen is 8 - 12 inches from your edge of my desk nearly optimal distance for touch, yet it truly is still the input approach to last resort. I am relieved when I tire of exploring Windows 8, praying to seek out some reason to utilize it as my primary OS, boot into Windows 7 brings functional comfort.
Building to the lowest common denominator appears to are already Windows Phone 7s strategy; Great solid OS that nobody wants make use of. I apply it; its simple, does what I would like it to do, nevertheless it isnt sexy enough for making people go to it. The best hardware and features are offered because of the competitors. When will this company community like a hole understand that any strategy that places the interests with the business over those from the customer can be a failed one? You cant force Metro, or start screen, or Windows Phone on your own customers because its a superb strategic move for Microsoft. Thats false logic. The only good strategic moves or those that happen to be right on your customers first and in addition happen to offer the business benefits. It doesnt work the opposite. Yes, that strategy seems to have already been initially successful, but declining markets, missed opportunities, along with a failed antitrust case latter, Id say its time for just a change.
I suggest creating an independent team to make an customer centric OS that focuses within the needs, desires, and psychology on the customer, in complete disregard associated with a company based strategic goals or biases. Use that OS being a starting point. The reality is which the MBAs will get a your hands on it and bastardize it, but at least in the event the starting point is customer centric then the final result are going to be more customer centric today. Windows 8 can be an OS driven almost completely through the business needs of Microsoft. Where Microsofts company needs and customer desires overlap, the OS will probably be a success. Where they disconnect, the OS will fail. It really is that straightforward.
Btw, start screen on Windows Server 2012, wtf!?Are the people at Microsoft so frightened of going contrary to the tide they havent said that a dumb idea? Any senior high school dropout advise you that doubling down with a dumb idea doesnt make an excellent one.
Oh, wait, theres more. I plugged my Windows Phone 7 into my Windows 8 computer, guess what happens happened, nothing; a lot for synergy relating to the platforms saving the morning.
The version of Media Center contained in Windows 8 's what we shipped inside Windows 8 Consumer Preview. It is much in accordance with what shipped in Windows 7.
That there has just killed my desires for continuing make use of WMC within my living room. I spent a lot of money buying a fanless PC specifically for that purpose of running WMC to ensure I could record play back TV recordings, and play DVDs Blu-Rays that I d ripped to storage everything electronically stored within my fingertips.
I guess I needs to have seen the writing around the wall if your eHome team was disbanded but I never wished to believe that Microsoft would wipe out such a fantastic computer program. As I commented within the previous writing, that is so similar towards the way Microsoft has handled smartphones: these folks were ahead of these time, stood a great product, lost the fight on it and left it to Apple Google to swoop in and show MS tips on how to do it. I guess within 3-4 years time we ll have MS releasing New Media Centre that has a nice change to it but less functionality laptop or computer has today?
I weep for some in the planning and making decisions at MS. I really do. I love using MS products. I love the way they integrate and deliver some in the best functionality available but this???
So I guess I m now considering moving to such as XBMC to experience back my media but I m struggling for the PVR solution where I can archive the recordings. I guess I ll find something, probably Linux based.
My HTPC will not be a general purpose desktop PC, also it certainly doesn t require extra features of Windows 8 Pro. You ve made my decision easy I won t upgrade my HTPC. I will continue to utilize Windows 7 Home Premium which consists of built-in Windows Media Center.
I m using W7MC extensively currently and I already pay extra to accomplish this, because doing so lacks DVB-C support and I should buy additional software for the. It s incredible since it already supports DVB-T and DVB-S.
I discover why we are likely to pay for W8MC, but I think it really should have at least this basic feature update over W7MC DVB-C obviously any good simplistic variant without CAM/CI and without DVB-C2, however it s far better to have those too.
In a great world we may also get EPG support for further countries.
Also, it might be nice if there's a separate Win8 article detailing international non-USA support in Win8, Win8Phone and associated online services:
interface language various levels, only most popular dialogs are translated or almost anything, etc.
input language physical keyboard writing, touch keyboard writing, handwriting, OCR, voice recognition, spellcheck, translation, etc.
local services/Bing maps; navigation car, pedestrian, bike, or buses; weather, road traffic, EPG, nearby places/landmarks/commercial entities/ATM points/etc., local cultural/sports/etc. events, etc.
For both Win8 and W8Phone I really need to have this option keep using English interface, but nonetheless having the capability to work with other input languages and lastly the correct local services. Currently if the W7Phone international user wants to work with his local services/input language he's forced to also have the machine interface in their local language! Very inconvenient! The interfaces are meant and formatted to become displayed in English, the terms are usually known in English, the translations could be unhealthy especially for your smaller languages, hence the experience gets poisoned!
The option is simple decouple interface language from input language and local services.
Another issue would be the phone keypad 0-9 with letters on each number please allow it to become dual-script currently it s only single-script the script with the interface language. Nokia/Symbian have this feature 5-10 a long time ago already, so Microsoft should also be able to sing it.
Windows 7: Adds AVCHD/H.264 support
Sorry, that s what it ought to have been, but rather, it s Removes DVD playback.
Well I don t use WMP for DVD playback, it s a dreadful video player, but this feels very wrong and also the FAQ just exacerbates the frustration. Apparently the MPEG2 license is 2, the Dolby one maybe another 3 the FAQ won't precise your money, so cheaper than 10 with MS margin, we don t have a very Windows 8 edition with DVD playback?!?
And I assume the Media Center pack are going to be bundled to extras, so even when we want exactly the 10 DVD support, customers may have to pay maybe 30 for features they won t use. This is exactly precisely the same issue Microsoft was seeking to avoid, have the ecosystem buy all these features.
You might at the same time have killed WMP and WMC: WMP because it truly is clearly only an audio player, not only a media player anymore without DVD and MP4/MKV support, and WMC because nobody will buy it when it costs extra and has to be downloaded again every time you install/reinstall Windows. This is very different coming from a more expensive edition like Ultimate that included through the start all you paid for.
I used Arcsoft TMT5 from the inside of WMC to learn Blu-rays yes, you will find still individuals who value optical media because of their unsurpassed car stereo quality, I guess I will now makes use of the standalone TMT5 player.
I also frequently play movies from driveless netbooks, thus it s a real wrong assumption that because laptop does not employ a BD/DVD drive, it does not want BD/DVD codecs. Ever heard of ripping?
And please stop mentioning your third party software that comes that has a retail version associated with an internal or external optical drive. First, a lot of people buy naked drives, they probably currently have several DVD codec licenses around and shouldn t need to pay for one again, which players are most with the time evaluation or limited in features or time-bombed versions with the full player.
I think the buyer usage statistics you base your decisions on is fundamentally wrong. Most people don t have Blu-ray not as a consequence of streaming, but because from the prohibitive tariff of Blu-ray playback over a computer. Between AnyDVD to rip my DVD/BD and Arcsoft TMT5 to try out them, I spent about 200. Basically, the price of your second Windows 7 Ultimate license. This is one other reason why a lot of people were expecting native DVD and Blu-ray playback in Windows 8. It would have been for the fee, and only to the purchasers with the Ultimate edition so it will not have cost anything on the ecosystem, but my guess is the fact that an integrated Microsoft solution would not need doubled the price tag on Windows as if it currently does of these essential basic features. Even removing DVD playback from Windows 7 Starter edition was obviously a mistake for netbook owners, as well as an insult for developing countries.
I have always upgraded all of my computers to your latest version of MS-DOS and Windows right right at that moment of their release, I feel no incentive to do this this time.
I am actually seriously considering abandoning Microsoft for open software to the first time within 25 years.
I ll probably still get a Storage Space server, but I doubt I ll ever upgrade my Windows 7 client machines to Windows 8.
Windows familiar with fit yourwants of every customer, now the political and marketing decisions made exclude the actual persons that are traditionally evangelized and recommended Microsoft products.
I hope Steven Sinofsky will not likely be known since the Brian Valentine of Windows 8.
The terms have become crisp and clear here. There isn't DVD playback and associated car stereo decoder licensing cost. Same put on broadcast TV. If you might have such hardware capabilities about the PC and require those devices to get user, buy alternative party solutions that have already licensed such IP from MPEG-LA or Dolby Labs or whatever. Incase you'll still need Microsoft software for playing DVDs and viewing/recording broadcast TV, there is certainly Media Center, and that is available through Media Center Pack or Pro Pack through Add features to Windows option.
Now the last blog post mentions that is planned being supported for an additional pair product lifecycle, that may be the Windows 8 lifecycle. And therefore, it didn t surprise me which the version built into Windows 8 is identical to in 7 with could be some fixes.
Well, we're all set out to get rid of the plastic disc entertainment industry being a whole AND also the broadcast dump box. If someone still wants to acquire entertained this way, there will probably be always specialized other software available.
I think we don t need any statistics to believe DVD video and broadcat TV on PC is about the decline.
Overall it's a super move, and I hope to determine these price savings when I buy and upgrade to Windows 8.
Dropping DVD playback are some things, but releasing an OS which cannot files out from the box appears like a step backwards.
As least, that may be how I am reading it. You aren t including an MPEG-2 video decoder in any respect?
I have files containing MPEG2 video here. MPEG1 is a bit more common, and MPEG2 more often used in DVD and broadcast as an alternative to files, but both understand used.
Of course, I ll still have the capacity to install something extra to realize the decoder, but it appears like a bizarre thing to take out. Playback of DVDs on computers could possibly be becoming rare but I don t think playback of MPG files is yet.
What about playing Quicktime movies like Windows 7 are capable of doing? I don t like to set up extra video codecs in my Windows machine since the majority of them are badly written or include malware. Please produce a stable video codecs pack that delivers support for Quicktime, DIVX, OGG, etc, and I is going to be happy to buy it. An official codecs add-on from Microsoft. I cost will be the issue, I can pay. I hate having to set up malware or stuff that break my computer down only to play a film for example created around the Mac. Please, cost is just not the issue.
You ought to be joking releasing an OS in 2012 that cannot even play back DVDs. I thought you experienced learned that lesson once Vista started including DVD playback, but apparently you seem a growing number of determined to generate Windows 8 a dysfunction. I really want Windows 8 to ensure success, but such things as this aren't the way to practice it. DVD and Blu-Ray playback is just not some optional extra, but an essential component of your modern OS, especially one that's so consumer-oriented.
Just because Apple ditched the optical disc, you don t must follow. Although increasingly it appears to be that really the only thing you happen to be capable off is wanting to copy Apple, and carrying it out badly. If I wanted Apple, I d employ a Mac. But while that you are copying what Apple has been doing, no less than copy their understanding that your mouse/keyboard interface is different from your touch interface.
If this then generated drastically reductions for Windows, at the very least there d become a reason. You don t take features away while charging exactly the same price!
Could you reconsider including native support for Matroska container MKV/MKA/WebM, Theora VP8 video, and Ogg Vorbis audio? They re trusted on YouTube WebM/VP8/Vorbis and Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons sites Ogg/Theora/Vorbis, which might be 3 and 6 hottest sites for the internet based on Alexa: //global and in addition they never get any lawsuit from anyone so far. And while you re in internet marketing, please add FLAC, Speex, among others too if you can.
I understand about supposedly potential risk should there be considered a real patent case inside the future, but isn t the allegedly infringed patents already licensed by Microsoft whenever you include MP3, H.264, AAC, etc. for playback with Windows? Shouldn t it functions this way? If not, is it possible you please elaborate for people? I m no lawyer, but have Microsoft s legal department actually execute a thorough study within this matter?
Please answer, thanks to you.
If Microsoft must pay all kinds of licensing and royalty fees to experiment with DVDs and Blu-rays, exactly why are there open-source software projects for example VLC and MPC-HC which are available free of charge? Or is that this some almost arrangement to push sales of PowerDVD?
Also, I d can't help but recommend including other open-source codecs and container formats for instance WebM, MKV, Vorbis and FLAC for starters. The costs have become low since the application has already been developed and it is open-source, and therefore no royalty payments are due. You ll get a good amount of happy users who wish out with the box support, and WebM/Theora support in IE would help resolve the thorny HTML5 video compatibility issues.
About Media Center. All I want to have to say is: they don t worry about us!
This is a dreadful decision. The alternative party fully licensed solutions for playing DVDs have already been and are simply dreadful. Back inside the XP days I had to work with them and frankly we were holding just thinly veiled up selling opportunities to have features that must have be included coupled with nowhere such as the stability with the native decoder.
The only people which will be happy with this decision will probably be the makers of PowerDVD along with the ilk and now we are going back to your bad days of the past of having to use a separate bad quality program, having a random interface, that doesn t integrate with anything else only to watch a DVD.
Well that s really stupid of Micrisift to believe us customer s that bought Windows 7 are gonna buy Windows 8 and pay extra money to have Windows 7 s version of Windows Media Center in Windows 8. It s absolute Microsoft and us smart folks are likely to say screw you together with keep 7. I know I am.
I ve got no motivation now to maneuver to Windows 8 for anything besides a tablet device. Without commitment into a metro app for broadcast tvrecorded tv there s daft in upgrading any media center or DVD drive equipped machine in case you re going to must buy the OS, then buy an add-on pack only to get to where you were beforehand.
Would I have the capacity to install k-lite MPC or VLC on Windows 8? If I need to experiment with DVD, would I manage to play on MPC or VLC without the penalty/royalty fee?
How regarding the pirated version of Windows 8? does it contain Media Center considering the required codecs?
Could you please add FLAC support to WMP/WMC?
That s really the only feature I regularly miss.
Also, I agree together with you leaving out DVD support out in the box. It s a waste investing in licenses, if many I d say the majority of people don t need that, either given that they won t be watching DVDs or since they ll use some alternative player.
Apologies for commenting offtopic but this seems an effective way to attract your attention.
I ve read your last summer August 29, 2011 6:15 PM article titled Improvements in Windows Explorer.
From the 3 Goals on the new Windows Explorer listed, the 3rd readsRespect Explorers heritage. Maintain the power and richness of Explorer and convey back essentially the most relevant and requested features in the Windows XP era if the current architecture and security label of Windows permits.
In this context, you think that single click expanding of folder trees microsoft windows feature has any probability of being reintroduced in windows 8 rtm, at least being an option? do whatever defaults you wish, but tend to I have it back?
Does the actual architecture and security model permits this?
as well as leave and ontopic comment: to everyone complaining about missing codecs, you will discover free available options at a internet search distance ffdshow would be the first to get to mind
I missed something from the post perphaps, however rationale for not such as dvd playback license is many computers usually are not even effective at dvd playback isn t the windows installation media a DVD?
So the writing is around the wall. If we upgrade Windows 7 With media Center AND DVD Playback to Windows 8, we now have to re-buy these characteristics The same one we already had on windows 7. OR buy that very special sku which includes media center OEM - Specific-Sku.
This is merely absurd, have you thought to ENABLE those two functions if the user upgrades from an edition which includes the codec/licence since we effectively Already Payed correctly! Why must this method be so Anti-Consumer?
I think it is a pointer to re-focus my company strategies endorsements faraway from Microsoft.
Or, why don't you let us Install DVD Playback and Media Center by typing a Windows 7 Product Key and leverage activation since it will be the exact same product? Something must be put in position where a user can retain strikes without requiring you to re-buy them. Treat it just like the domain join feature from Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005, when you upgraded from MCE 2004 or XP Pro you kept domain join.
Is an alternative to your Media Centre Extender being developed? It s not perfect as is also, and I would love to employ a way to easily, wirelessly playback photos and videos from my PC to my Xbox.
Apple s made some good headway into search engine optimization gainesville with their AppleTV, and mirroring feature which allows a tablet being used for an extra screen. Intel s been pushing it s WiDi technology to wirelessly stream an exhibition onto a TV. There s no question around my mind that consumers want a straightforward solution to connect various screens within their lives, and with all the current Xbox 360s available, it seems like like an excellent opportunity to acquire into that market.
I have doubts however I haven t seen one particular effort from Microsoft that wasn t poorly implemented. Just too many steps also to complicated to create took me 20 min to understand the Play-To feature which doesn t always work. And the Windows Phone Companion app that requires 30 seconds to reconnect every time its screen locks out not really a very effective handy remote control, right?
Microsoft will probably keep crippling WMC for Canadians by intentionally disabling ATSC support. And now they cook us pay extra for DVD support. It s like they re doing everything of their power to generate sure nobody wants than it.
Even within this matter you re just following Apple s lead. I have always been capable of justify Windows cost with all the cost of your gazillion things such since the cost of patents, codec license agreements, etc although not anymore. This is really a disgrace. I will probably be sticking to Windows 7.
Guys, let s go through the facts. Potentially and hopefully an incredible number of ultrabooks and tablets is going to be sold inside the next few years running Windows 8 all that will be sold without optical drives. Physical disk usage is going down. It can be ridiculous to pour a lot of dollars on the Codec owners in the event the codecs will never be used. The option to get these capabilities just as one add-on might appear to be a reasonable compromise. Furthermore, PCs sold as Media centric devices can readily integrate vacation apps to make up.
And as long as being the combined valuation on Windows 8 as well as the Pro Pack isn t unreasonable, I can t see what the challenge is in upgrading Windows 7. Essentially, you d be paying exactly the same presumably price had the codec been included in the start, but when you don t require it, you could be paying less. Sounds fair in my opinion.
That 's all perfectly reasonable, to date best explained by Hal //media - center - dvd-playback-and-microsofts- media - strategy, but just the same non-inspiring at best.
Fundamentally, they are workarounds for just a problem we needs to be really considering.
As DLNA or AirPlay gain in popularity, the private computer to be a home entertainment device becomes obsolete. We will we be spending money on access and royalties on each device, and, just what it all depends upon, per-view or incomprehensible webs of competing flat-rates.
And all of that while we gradually loose control of what we've got access to.
Steven, congrats reimagining windows media !???
JF: Essentially, you d be paying a similar presumably price had the codec been included from your start, but in case you don t require it, you could well be paying less. Sounds fair in my opinion.
Bull! They would charge whatever they would charge for the Windows 8 purchase/upgrade. The less they pay to license third-party IP/code, the harder profit from each copy of Windows.
I view the points here, all valid. I just have 3 sincere recommendations. Firstly don t limit WMC to Pro. It wouldn t confuse the earth to provide the Media Pack as one more feature for the standard edition, or as part with the Pro edition. Don t believe that everyone who might want WMC would like Pro too. Secondly if everyone is paying more for DVD playback- don t limit it to WMC. People like Windows Media Player; and surely some people will only turn out confused as after paying to have the ability to play DVD s- they still can t do it in WMP. Finally if WMC not the codecs for dvd playback- but WMC entirely is being a charged add-on feature- ensure it is better! If you re about to take out a function that was once included in order to charge us to have it back- at the very least have the decency to generate it worth our while- a good Metro version or front-end at least could be nice.
I are already a WMC user since 2005 and yes it is heavily incorporated into my home. I have found the lack of the substantial updates to your product troubling. Knowing how the product is essentially exactly the same from Win7 to Win8 tells me that nobody at Microsoft is working for the product to get more than maintenance.
So off it spins to your pro pack similar to the incredibly successful Win95 Plus! LOL. Next it's going to terminate like Microsoft Money. I wish Microsoft would certainly donate the code for MCE with an Open Source project and also be done with it. Then I might make informed decisions about how precisely much time to devote into a product I worry might find no innovations and declining a declining user base with the next 5 years and after that be quietly terminated.
I desire to ask that you implement some features in Win8. First of, I employ a fear that treatment of start button is NOT a superb move particularly if I see no real need to get rid of it.
Then, I want you to definitely evolve the laptop keyboard layout system by permitting Windows to take keyboard layout DLLs that export KbdLayerDescriptor old type DLLs and a brand new type of DLL that could export a function that accepts the true secret code plus the modifiers and outputs a string. This new style of DLL is NEEDED to create keyboard layouts with chained dead keys that allow processsing about the past and provide user s input removal of chained dead keys order importance, provide flexible output, allow implementaion of keyboard state memory, etc. The way keyboard layouts work today, writing in ancient, latin, etc requires superhuman memory to consider countless dead keys. A sample Visual Studio project implemeting the newest type of keyboard layout DLL could well be nice too.
IE9 and then has been greatly improved inside the UI, but I think you ought to improve more the performance and also the delay when closing and opening tabs combine parallelism, hide the closing tab first and after that shut it down inside background. Also, I have pointed out that IE9 changes the rendering of some HTML content if your user selects it. I think this can be a big bug.I also think that it could be nice for IE to be capable of or native addons and you also to provide samples on the best way to write an addon I know there is certainly addon support for IE but judging from your number and quality in the existing addons, I don t think the existing interface or documentation is a good example.
Next, I want that you improve the CHM reader and also the CHM compiler of HTML Help Workshop in Windows. CHM files are WIDELY used today plus your OS has problems coping with them. First of, every time a CHM file is located within a path containing the character you fails to see the HTML pages there. Also, people uses an old version of IE where I have understood and will not render corectly the HTML pages, will not support Javascript and generates REALLY annoying error messages when javascript code efforts to execute. Also the compiler has MANY problems, as well because the HTML Workshop itself. I have bothered writing an app that replaces HTML Help Workshop and uses to compile the CHM however the bugs in were more that I thought. Can you please fix any of such?
Also, it will be nice should you made the Windows snipping tool capable to record video on the screen.
All those complaining regarding the removal of codecs explain why it s a difficulty installing a different codec pack? Microsoft did give reasonable justification in this it can't make sense making all windows users pay correctly when a smaller number utilize it.
One question I really have, once you talk about removing DVD support from Windows Media player I take it you might be talking about support for DVD video discs, not the ability to aid MPEG2 and other formats with alternative codec packs?
Also your justification for forcing us to upgrade to Windows 8 Pro in order for getting Media Center will not make any sense. If it s because most people that run Media Center have Windows Ultimate or XP Pro Media, isn t it owing to XP you possessed no choise with Vista 7 because these are typically peoples who will be running it on his or her general purpose pc in which particular case Windows 8 Pro features will sell themselves? But for those like myself who use it from the lounge I fail to determine how any in the pro features are helpful. Is it because for people your real reason should be to push us on the xbox? Does which may have the capacity to record digital tv, could we play videos off a web site, will we install 3rd party addons?
So what things to call Windows Media Player for Windows 8? Windows CD Player? Windows Tiny Fraction Media Player WTF Media Player!
I believe that Dean up above is correct and how the consumer is unlikely to find out anything on the 2 saved. Windows 8 is usually unlikely being as cheap because 20 that Apple charges for the upgrades. The money saved by MS is likely to get wiped out because of the bad publicitiy it generates/marketing money required to counter it. Perhaps the 2 is likely to be familiar with pay Steve Ballmer s severence pay once Windows 8 launched!
If it s a legitimate license fee thing, I don t realize why DVD playback support is lost by using an upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8. If I have Windows 7 in this little PC, the license fee has already been taken care of my device, upgrading to Windows 8 shouldn't take it away.
I must repeat the art of succinct writing is just not a quality of Microsoft websites. Sprawling overlong prose which could simply be shorter include the norm.
Nevertheless, you'll find few things which I will not understand: First, if you will discover patent fees, how comes you can find free and open-source MPEG-2 decoders? Second, if we're eventually to buy codecs, you will want to pay Microsoft? Surely, Microsoft does like being paid, doesn t it? Third, why not consider continued not enough support for royalty-free open formats?
In the final, I have absolutely nothing to complain: I will continue my practice of installing third-party codec packs. But I am also setting up a point of not being particularly looking forward to Windows 8.
Can someone please write a PVR program that props up the Copy Once Flag? Preferably on Linux. Would also buy extender like capabilities for multiple TV s
It appears like Microsoft just WANTS media center to die slowly. This is another step closer for it s demise. The reason to reduce it through the Windows 8 release lowering cost might appear to be BS in my experience, I m sure we won t use whatever difference in price with earlier Windows releases.
I think the explanation Media Center isn't being used much just isn't because online sources are very popular, but because Media Center isn t convincing enough to do business with yet! Maybe it s the EPG which is still unreliable, maybe the possible lack of official support for DVB-C CAM or even it could be the lack of native support for popular file formats as FLAC or MKV. The product just doesn t seem being actively developed.
One thing you can see, making Media Center available like a paid addon pack will:
1. Keep users from upgrading to Windows 8 Metro is only another gimmick much like the sidebar/gadget and users will not likely notice other improvements over Windows 7.
2. Users that ARE using Media Center and do upgrade, will possibly switch to your better and/or free alternative like Mediaportal, effectuating Microsoft s are convinced that usage is declining. In the next version of Windows, Microsoft is likely to remove Media Center by proclaiming that usage is negligable.
So, looking in the last post, removing WTV and MKV container support was only an oversight. right?
I am an individual that only recently found WMC useful since the multiple stream CableCard tuners reached market. I am sure I wasn't alone, and each of this began in mid/late 2010.
I agree within the feeling of excitement over Windows 8 fading away. First Metro, which will be the most unreasonable idea around my opinion, and now removing some codecs. But I m very happy with what I have with Windows 7, and I strongly doubt savings on codecs could well be brought to consumers with cheap of upgrade. I wish they were a minimum of used being a compensation to pay for the poor developers who needed to withstand programming Metro.
Still, I hope this succeeds and revolutionises how we work together with computers. For my part, however, I am not amused in any respect with another disappointing section of information about the revolutionary system.
temp1234567 I wholeheartedly agree with the assessment.
One more thing. As you kill of Media Center, can you at the least GPL the extender technologies?
PLS removing Windows Media Player.
From the many posts it seems like another error on MS part as invertible.
MS does consume a paten though.
Win 98 was great, Millennium has not been
Win 7 was great, Win 8 who knows yet not looking good to date.
I don t know why they keep needing a kick within the financial nuts before they pay attention to their customers and earn another great product. Why design a product for being released for that everyday device, to get interfaced with using primarily touch. Most people I know will not have touchscreen display screen facilities, utilize this type they bother upgrading.
To get facilities they are able to t use and ought to now spend on ones they are doing. I know it is MS push in an attempt to get some from the tabletphone market by some form of unity, but as to the expense to your desktop user. Even APPLE that are great at making shiny shiny things haven t compromised OS X wanting to make a desktop experience into one of any tablet.
So the reason Mac OS costs what 50 and it also plays DVD? Dear Microsoft why make use of Windows Media Player? Why not only remove it from Windows?
Windows 8 is wrong to begin with with. Metro may be the biggest bullshit we've see within the history of OS. That thing would need to gtfo Windows and then we are able to talk the remainder.
I think overall you've got drawn an affordable compromise.
I will be capable of upgrade my PC within the living room to Windows 8 Pro, spend the money for incremental royalties and continue to utilize the PC as my TV equally as I have to the past 4 or five years. I think people need to hold in mind that this Media Center Pack which consists of marginal cost includes the decoders required to try out DVDs through Media Center. We can bicker all day long around the fact that it'd be nice when the DVD tab in Media Player magically appeared once the codecs were installed. But around the flip side of the usb ports, I don t know of the other commercial enterprise that is certainly willing to license the DVD related codecs with their customer base for what is largely the incremental price. Cyberlink wants 50 for PowerDVD, and WalMart doesn t regularly sell DVD players with the cost in the codec license.
I thank you for that huge gesture of proper will being shown here that essentially allows your entire client base to acquire DVD playback functionality for your marginal cost. Any of our users who need to try out DVDs can simply give the 10 to look from Pro to MC, stick in a very DVD, and go.
And the upgrade paths seem DIRT SIMPLE and easy to go into detail and understand. If you stick inside a DVD in W8 and you can find no decoders, a box shows up that says Many users don t play DVDs anymore. You can enable this functionality by upgrading to W8 Pro with Media for 50. If you've got W8 Pro, the deal that you are presented with is even sweeter because it's truly the marginal cost.
That means royalties relevant to DVD playback in Windows 7 are already paid broadly, no matter whether or not the PC has a optical drive. Based on sales and usage, we supplied codecs into a very large volume of PCs that have been not efficient at playing DVDs or just did not ever play DVDs.
There is no ought to have an optical drive to experience a DVD.
The DVD is definitely media to keep the contents on the DVD format.
That format is usually saved as a possible ISO file and mounted to try out.
I disagree with most of what is written.
But that is hardly the forum to talk about it ever since the decision is definitely made.
You really should have brought this up 2-3 years back.
So I will make my voice heard with my wallet: you lost me like a customer.
And since I am the IT administrator for my business, I can let you know that we shall not be downgrading to Win 8.
We use DVDs MPEG2 internally, not for movies, nevertheless for internal training and also other purposes.
We have tried several third-party solutions, but they also are, the bottomline is, terrible.
Hopefully before Windows 9 you'll get the message.
Great explanation containing useful facts and figures. That said promoted, really, really may seem like Microsoft is attempting to talk itself from producing a full-featured desktop operating-system. Metrics and telemetry, please save us from being full-featured.
It s pretty obvious why apple doesn t include certain features. Blu-ray is just a bag of hurt because doing so competes with Apples own, often dearer, always lower quality movie downloads. Also there may be no cause of an ODD if software is gonna be sold not to a individual consumer but to your group of machines using the same Apple ID.
So I guess Microsoft will be selling digital downloads playable using a limited volume of authorized machines? That might work with mall rats carrying around tablets of their backpacks but it really doesn t work to me.
I m certainly one of those dinosaurs that likes hard copies, got twenty pieces of Photoshop for both Mac and Windows even though it could be purchased online. I can get a Blu-ray combo pack from Amazon, often pay lower than an inferior-quality iTunes digital download, make an MKV copy so I can watch the movie that I bought on either Mac or Windows systems, and also have my copy to take with a friend s house or play on my small HT BR/DVD player.
I don t find out how Windows 8 improves the above described experience. OS X Lion, Windows 7, MakeMKV, VLC and PowerDVD handle my wants and requirements all without giant brightly-colored rectangles spoiling my view. Bag the rectangles and gives full Microsoft support with a fair price so we ll talk.
Just a communication on every one of the suggestions for additional codec support.
This is a thing we covered during Windows 7 development plus more recently during IE9 development. This blog isn t a place to debate the practicality of using/licensing of other codecs, but we've got talked around the principles and practical realities of shipping these within commercial software products. This post around the ieblog is relevant to your discussion around any with the other technologies mentioned within the comments here. Our position is in line with regard to your principles described as post. Please understand that freely downloadable or open source usually are not relevant to your intellectual property rights contained within that code. I recognize this can be an emotional and frustrating topic for a few who see this blog, but this could be the framework we need to work within.
Alan The notion of playing DVDs minus the optical media has become brought up more than once in comments. This may be an issue of legal proceedings in lots of markets and our position is valid in main markets in terms of optical media that contain some form of IP protection.
AZJack DVD distribution of software will not require the license for DVD playback of movies. If you do download Windows 8 as millions have done to the Consumer Preview you're going to get a DVD data ISO which it is possible to burn to a optical disc in case you prefer.
Is the power for Media Player to experience DVDs is entirely removed or merely the decoders therefore we supply a vacation decoder, will we play a DVD in Media Player? Media Player had some DVD-video standard specific functionality. Is that removed or it returns if you give you the MPEG-2 and audio decoders?
I hate being off topic. There s not Blog about this. I may even step on the few feet here but can it be true that windows 8 Core home? dose not have access to Domain support. As well as Not having remote desktop support IE rdp client to attach to other computers? //windows - 8-removes-updates-desktop-features
Im about to be exactly like windows XP. Windows 8 Home will not likely be popular and MS will wind up only selling Windows 8 Pro a after 12 months of being on market.
I ll be taking a look at getting Windows 8 Pro lounge chair somewhere yet. corp. edition for my gaming rig and tablet since its such as only version containing ever thing in the sun. IE windows to visit
Adding the power for customers to get add-ons is often a great, and long over due, thing. However We believe those customers also are interested within the additional features provided inside Windows 8 Pro edition, for instance Boot from VHD, Client Hyper-V, etc., especially whenever they are using Media Center over a PC used in general tasks is dumb. Why can t I just purchase each component separately? I ve TRIED to make use of MC in Win7 nonetheless it sucks, promoted does. You should really either buy/hire xbmc and also have them design your MC or simply copy what they can be doing. Eventually everyone should work while using content providers on an open accessible solution to query their offerings and employ MC as being a single interface allowing people to glance at the content of a bunch of their services like hulu, zune, netflix, vudu, etc watching what they desire to watch, when they wish to watch it.
Do you guys be aware that you could have to buy Media Center which from the things i gather won t support Blu Ray therefore it means you could have to pay additional 50 in addition to it for alternative party blu ray software. Windows 8 can cost you more than Windows 7.
Aaron The usage rights to the telltale codecs needed to try out DVD will not carry forward to your new version of Windows once you upgrade. These terms are defined with the licensors of those technologies, not Microsoft or OEMs.
Why would the Home edition need to have the capacity to join a Domain? It s an attractive niche scenario to become running a full-on Windows Domain at your home. As for Remote Desktop, I beleive that like all previous releases you will still develop the client software required to Remote Desktop into another machine, it s merely the RD server ingredient that let s you access the device remotely that's limited towards the Pro/Enterprise SKU.
Why don t you may ask the developers of VLC where did they cover their obligation to repay the DVD licensing codec usage? Hint: I suspect they merely don t.