tiger woods pga tour 13 downloadable courseswindows xp professional 2002 download softwarewindows server 2003 enterprise edition iso free downloadwindows 7 ultimate 32 bit download free full version
Yes, you're right, it truly is, thus, making this one on the FIRST guns I need to photograph an actual one and replace this Airsoft abomination. MoviePropMaster2008 07:26, 20 May 2010 UTC
An airsoft gun as well as a cap gun arent exactly the same thing. LOL Spartan198 11:43, 19 June 2011 CDT
seriously doubt anyone opportunity see an underslung version in the M203 utilized in a film, simply by
but there are stand alone M203 launchers modified which has a pistol grip and stock much like the M79LF 37mm launchers and also the M203 being mounted on guns in addition to the M16 take Rambo III as an example where they attached it for an AK. Having a section around the M16 w M203 for the M16 page is sensible since that's where men and women look if theyre interested in that particular combo appearing within a movie. But I like having another page to the M203 to cope with more detailed history with the launcher plus any applications the location where the launcher is employed with other weapons. Just a
We do have to have a page where M203s are being used as standalone launchers, rare, nevertheless it has happened. But we need to shift all M203s underslung to M16s to your M16 Page this will let you note directing users compared to that page when evaluating that combination for the M203 page. Just MoviePropMaster2008 01:27, 12 November 2008 UTC
Makes sense, that configuration. Also, there is a standalone M203 on Bones, there might be others sometime WAY in the near future, every time a director desires to use a modern version of your M79, like how James Cameron used the fictional roto-craft in place in the Huey.
MoviePropMaster2008 has explained that almost all on the M16A2s found in movies are A2 uppers on A1 lowers, often with A1 flash hiders. By this definition, do not require are true M16A2s, and can actually be considered M16A3s roughly. But since theyre usually seen impersonating M16A2s, I say designate by receiver style only the two A2 and A3 have precisely what is usually the A2 receiver.
In plain english, I think we have to ditch the M16A3 category completely. It could not make any sense to differentiate between A2s and A3s when basically all from the Hollywood A2s and A3s is the same type of gun. - MT2008 20:39, 3 January 2009 UTC
I never got anyones feedback for this, decided to go ahead and ditch the M16A3 entry, for that reasons I explained above. It doesnt be the better choice to try and distinguish between A2s and A3s in movies when MoviePropMaster has explained that theyre all basically a similar thing - A2-style uppers on fully automatic A1 lowers. By that definition, not one of them are true M16A2s, but as theyre obviously expected to portray such rifles in movies, it can make more sense to contact A2s. - MT2008 01:15, 23 January 2009 UTC
I agree, as the M16A3 is made for Navy SEALs and SeeBees, no civilian hands hae touched them. - Winchester 1-26-09
I believe the 1995 remake of Village on the Damned portrayed the National Guard using burst fire. - - AdAstra2009 03:12, 2 December 2009 UTC
the above is at reply into a comment how the author deleted while i posted. - - AdAstra2009 03:28, 2 December 2009 UTC
Also I think Colt sold A3s to foreign entities, National police of allied countries, Elite units, etc. Any country which we are friendly and Colt has sold weapons previously. Ive heard that A3s were sold as samples to France, and Germany but that has been a casual comment that I heard in the past. There could be A3s inside the armories of foreign movie productions. That is really a completely grey area in which I have no person to verify anything. : MoviePropMaster2008 05:15, 2 December 2009 UTC
This is strange. I posted a comment here several hours ago, asking what number of movies will there be were burst fire is portrayed? I know Black Hawk Down has one instant. Excalibur01 05:22, 2 December 2009 UTC
Ive seen some films which had three round burst fire. I will try and get the titles and list them 205.172.16.102 01:38, 30 March 2010 UTC
There is usually a significant difference from the true A2 and A3 M16. Externally, they are identical, nevertheless the A3 is full auto as well as the A2 is 3 shot burst. Simply put: A1 and A3 are full auto, A2 and A4 are 3 shot burst. The external differences are what convert it into a little much easier to identify. We all determine what an A1, A2, and A4 M16 resemble, though the A3 is definitely an A2 that may be full auto. Hope this assists; Its my new posting. - - Ranger12 10:14, 29 October 2011 CDT
I what food was in the National Guard within the early 90s and thats just what we had. I was also issued an M16A1 with A2 handguards in basic training. It turns out that its simpler and-from what I heard-cheaper to change the A1 guards with A2 guards for the reason that A2s are less complex and you also only need to stock one type as opposed to lefts and rights. Also, the A1a inside national guard were freshly rebuilt, tested, together the serial numbers laser etched into your bolt carriers. They were issued effortlessly A2 furniture.
Yeah, Ive seen lots of A1s with A2 hand guards elsewhere. In fact, if you happen to watch footage in the current offensive into Gaza, you will notice both IDF personnel and Hamas militants utilizing them. The Israelis received plenty of M16A1s and still have updated some of them with the M16A2 hand guards. Many of these rifles were passed into Israelis allies in Fatah, and after that Hamas stole an abundance of them throughout their war with Fatah some were also probably stolen on the IDF themselves. - MT2008 22:53, 9 January 2009 UTC
RP Marines wood M16A1s with A2 handguards.
Thanks I pasted it from that page but we need to probably explore getting a noncopyrighted one. - User:AdAstra2009
Well, you are able to ask MoviePropMaster2008 if she has a Mark 12 upper in the companys inventory. I imagine actually is well liked knows armorers at Cinema Weaponry the fellows who supplied the weapons for Live Free or Die Hard, so he even be able to dig up us one in the same guns utilized in that movie. But hes very busy naturally and has LOTS of other image requests to usually, so it may be a while before he gets around into it. - MT2008
Does anyone are aware of the rate of fire around the M16A1? Oliveira 22:05, 17 May 2009 UTC
I assume its about 800 rounds a moment Excalibur01 08:48, 6 June 2009 UTC
That could well be correct, its around 750 to 800 RPM. Spartan198 15:28, 18 January 2010 UTC
Its certainly not from a movie, but a music video, and I havnt had time to figure out what this AR is yet, there's two others within the video, ones an M16A1, the opposite an A2, but I just cant figure this blog out.
The gun from the first cap looks different in the CAR-15s within the other pictures. Maybe its a fake XM177?- Oliveira 12:52, 6 June 2009 UTC
Its in the music video for Hero Of War by Rise Against, the primary soldier uses it, his two buddies utilize an M16A1 and M16A2, Im almost 100% sure there are merely three rifles inside the video. Yeah, Im thinking M733 Alex T Snow
I don't forget the weapon from Pink Cadillac an XM607, or perhaps AR-15 modified to imitate one. The weapon might possibly not have been officially adopted but kits were released towards the public though:
I changed the entry after I watched the trailer with the movie. The trailer is on YouTube, along with the gun you want is visible in the 00:27-00:28 mark:
That is usually an older-model LaFrance Specialties M16K. It do not have the triangular front sight post on the XM607. - MT2008 18:08, 3 July 2009 UTC
Can people please stop posting the photos of M16 variants that have been edited using MPMs photos? Theres a reason Ive removed them before. We dont need to possess every variant around the page, and many are inaccurate, anyway. The only one we allow would be the XM16E1, because we do not possess a good photo of a single of those yet, as well as that may get replaced. - MT2008
The Colt 607 image I posted wasnt certainly one of MPMs unless someone stole it and re-hosted it, I first got it from google. Only use it here since the page for your The World Is Not Enough videogame didnt employ a 607 image. Vangelis 05:18, 3 August 2009 UTC
When the Model 727 is merely the commercial Colt name for your M4 carbine? it doesnt sound right to contain the exact GUN manufactured by Colt featuring its commercial good name for law enforcement sales or international sales having a separate category, if this should just be merged in with all the M4/M4A1 category. The M16 page is receiving out of control. MPM2008
I agree that this Model 727 needs to be merged while using M4 category, however it is not exactly a commercial reputation for an M4. The Model 777 may be the commercial name to the very first M4 one that didnt possess the detachable carry handle. The 727 and 777 are similar, though the 727 is safe-semi-auto plus the 777 is safe-semi-burst. - MT2008
Good point. But from the overall view, I think everything that info a should be from the M4 category, b needs to be a footnote, NOT a different category and c individuals are endlessly creating separate categories for weapons which are essentially the identical guns as other categories. Experienced IMFDB users/Mods know already that most on the M16 variants found in films are build ups of other guns. We usually just obtain the accessories and barreled uppers and place them on our full auto or semi auto lowers. Why spend thousands for getting new guns when were landing on dozens and a large number of other M16s? Also, in VideoGames and Anime, again, they do not have to specify the brand new or commercial model unless its specifically stated or named explicitly. Even then it's really a footnote from the original category.
Im receiving a little annoyed with others adding images we dont need around the page, including many that happen to be crap and which arent necessary. Not to mention that one half of them arent even while using br clearall command to ensure the images wont drift in to the next gun entry. So, Im investing a stop to this particular now. No more without discussing it here first. Next one who doesnt respect my wishes gets to be a 1-week day out. - MT2008 17:23, 18 September 2009 UTC
Theyre still performing it. I have removed the custom A1 upper attached to an SP1 lower with A2 handguards because of this page repeatedly. It is not a typical real like frankengun however it has happened. I originally built this and photographed it with the HEAT page until better screenshots proved that Wes Studis AR15 was an A1 style lower, not an SP1. MoviePropMaster2008 21:35, 1 October 2009 UTC
I couldnt agree more, for whatever reason, these users manage to think that every picture of your gun has to be on its page. It especially frustrates me when theyre sticking all customized guns that only show up in one movie onto a webpage, they could look cool, but theyre even if it's just standard configurations! All they find yourself doing is turning the gun page to a cluttered, sloppy mess of pictures, I mean just look on the Remington 870 and Mossberg 500 pages.- Alienqueen11 22:37, 18 September 2009 UTC
M4A1 5.56x45mm with M68 Aimpoint red dot scope, flip-up rear sight, and M203 grenade launcher 40mm
Figured that since the opposite sections around the page have pics with the basic and tricked-out versions, why not that one? Orca1 9904 21:40, 5 October 2009 UTC
Does anyone get pictures of an heavily modified M4 style platform? ex- The Unit, BlackHawk Down, Tears from the Sun? Dirtdiver6421 17:13, 2 August 2010 UTC
So why don't you update this site to include current issue M16A4 rifles? until you dont know what they have to
For years I have been looking into what the guns were Peter Roger employed in Dawn in the Dead. This site solved the problem a lot of other gun experts on IMDb cannot. Again, many thanks.
I couldnt find an authentic picture so I put this together. Its an M4A1 together with the old style stock, along with a straight no cuts 16 barrel; or its a Sporter or one of these older three number ones like that which has a removable carry handle; choose. I was just wondering exactly what it actually
Every detail is intentional and just how its meant to be though its not a true picture, additionally everyone knows that. ;
It could be a hybrid commercial AR variant. It posseses an M16A1 style lower receiver, so it really is NOT a Sporter I or II. Basically, its an M4 Carbine having a flat top and detachable carry handle, with an old-style buttstock as well as a civilian HBAR Carbine barrel outfitted with RIS forearms. Various manufacturers made similar guns for this design, like Bushmaster plus a few others. Also many builders of AR15s made similar guns from parts kits from M A, Patriot Arms, the now defunct Nesard, Sun Valley, as well as others. With the advance of custom builds from aftermarket parts from a large number of manufacturers, the AR15 is just about the ultimate mutt. I advise you this is NOT an issued military variant, thus it would NOT have an M designation unless it turned out built from an M4 to start with. Also almost everyone uses the step down M4 style barrels for carbines, unless is ultra light. The HBAR Carbine style barrels have grown to be rarer each day since their heyday was the 1990s. MoviePropMaster2008 07:30, 12 February 2010 UTC
Thanks lots, very informative answer. This will be the M4 Carbine in Call Of Duty 4, and Ive been wanting to figure out precisely what it actually is for a while. I didnt say where it turned out from because I figured the result Id get could be something like its a videogame, so its probably not a true model, but I knew that ; I just like the look and also have been working to make it as a possible airsoft project, it will help a bad airsoft HBAR barrels have become hard to come by. Alex T Snow 07:43, 12 February 2010 UTC
How have you make that? At first I thought it turned out Pimp My Gun, but PMG do not have an M16A1 pistol grip yet. Spartan198 14:22, 12 February 2010 UTC
No, you thought right my buddy, it's Pimp My Gun, I just used MS Paint to get rid of the little finger nub generating the HBAR barrel by copying and pasting the biggest part in the barrel above the rest from it. Thats the many photoshopping that I did. Alex T Snow 07:45, 13
If its from CoD4, then blame deficiency of details on modelers that made that gun model. They simply saved some poligons for improved performance with the game. Same thing with absence of gas-block when front sight is slowly removed. It expected to be M4A1 and im 100% sure that they had pictures of military issued M4A1s to be a reference.
Im sure they wanted that it is an M4A1, but Ive seen many movies where HK94s were transformed into be MP5s, or 92FSs were reconstructed as be 93Rs and last I checked with this site we identify guns on the things they are, not what theyre designed to Alex T Snow 00:03, 5 April 2010 UTC
In this current, does anyone think that much like the Ak47 as well as variants, the M16A1 series might be stereotypically portrayed as being a bad guys gun? Ive seen the IRA, FARC guerillas, Mexican drug lords and a few gangbangers have used them. Overall is true?
In reality, the USSR dumped an incredible number of AKs to the hands of satellite states and insurgents around the globe. In the Vietnam and immediate post Vietnam years the dumped an incredible number of M16A1s in our allies. With the fall of Vietnam, all on the South Vietnamese M16A1s ended up inside the hands of communist guerillas plus the AK. The AK as well as the M16 were one of the most prolifically distributed weapons on the last fifty years. There is not any conspiracy include them as look bad. Theyre inside hands of everyone so it really is invevitable.
Even Iran utilizes a variant in the M16A1, a copy with the Norinco CQ referred to as the S-5.56, his or her standard rifle. Spartan198 15:18, 15 May 2010 UTC
I was in a very gun shop in Michigan today and saw a weapon by having an AR-15 type body but using the mag of any P-90 running across the rail. I asked the guy for the shop anf the husband did look into the weapon did fire the 5.7 round. Anyone have idea who definitely makes the weapon and what it really may be called? Incidentally a shop was The Firing Line in Westland Michigan. - - Charon68 03:44, 9 May 2010 UTC
They sell those uppers in California each of the time. My local gun store has 5.7mm firing AR15 uppers that grab the P90 magazine. But I never bothered to evaluate who managed to get, thats what GOOGLE is perfect for. I just never had interest in it MoviePropMaster2008 07:07, 9 May 2010 UTC
I have witnessed examples in this conversion also. It will be a specially-made upper receiver which can be mounted onto just about any AR-15 style lower receiver. The magazine mounts down the top from the weapon as together with the P90, as well as the original magazine well inside lower receiver becomes the ejection port together with the spent brass falling down through there rather than being spit out for the side. As with the manufacturer, I cant quite recall who can make it, but it really is definitely quite a fascinating piece of hardware. Orca1 9904 07:16, 9 May 2010 UTC
As long as my memory goes, is known as the AR-57 which is manufactured by 57Center, or something like this - - Yocapo32 15:17, 9 May 2010 UTC
The manufacturers web page, as Yocapo32 described, is 57 Center. Their site is here: /
Whats interesting is that this AR magazine well is the place that the brass gets ejected. The only problem I can see by having a P90 magazine installed on top is the fact it leaves limited rail space number one for mounting accessories. You could employ a scope or iron sights, but not much else. - MT2008 15:44, 9 May 2010 UTC
Thanks for your info guys, again, I know this is not germane towards the topic, it had been just a little odd to find out something like this as I had never read about it before. - - Charon68 16:05, 9 May 2010 UTC
In actual is there ever any whereby traders police have seized M4A1 carbines from criminials or terrorists during raids?
Do you mean mil-spec M4s, compared to semi-auto AR-15 carbines which might be patterned as soon as the M4? I would doubt it. - MT2008 21:25, 14 May 2010 UTC
Never, if not it has never been reported anywhere, ever. And I am dealing with real select fire 14.5 barreled M4/M4A1 carbines. However, California has already established a rash of MP5s and MP5Ks stolen outside of police cars, which are left unlocked once the cops were in a very strip club. Seriously. they haven't yet shown up MoviePropMaster2008 06:31, 15 May 2010 UTC
Theyre probably somewhere in Mexico at the moment, in the event you catch my drift. Spartan198 03:39, 29 March 2012 CDT
Which weapon may be known as better for infantry? An M16A1/M203 combo or perhaps OICW?
M16A1/M203. The XM29 weighs damn near 20 lbs., in comparison to 8 or 9 lbs. for your M16 when fitted using a 203. Fire control system you aren't, the very last thing Id need to be stuck with on the 60 mile march is definitely an F-ing 20 lbs. rifle. And sign you by typing four after them. Spartan198 23:17, 14 May 2010 UTC
The M16/M203 combo is without a doubt superior; it's got been proven in real-world combat situations in the last 30-plus years, whereas the sole live-fire situation the XM29 has seen for the most is in the Aberdeen testing ranges. The closest replacement the M16/M203 will more than likely see anytime soon is definitely an FN SCARM320, and in many cases then the SCAR is simply in limited use using the 75th Ranger Regiment at the moment. Orca1 9904 05:12, 20 May 2010 UTC
The real question is whether you aren't the XM8 Carbine is superior to the M4A1/derivatives H K 416, REC7, etc. And we probably wont ever know.
Also, the OICW was more of an man-portable version of an Doom gun than whatever you would actually bother carrying available. 20mm airburst auto-loader, saboted sub-5.56mm rounds? What is it possible you use that for apart from trying to clear a drug cartels fortified mansion alone?
One on the many stuff that led on the death with the XM29 was its sheer size. The Army wanted it scaled down to your size connected with an M4 1 and 14 lbs max which an M4 operating its mods gets pretty near, but todays technology, it simply wasnt possible. Maybe in 19 years or in order that it will be, nevertheless the XM29 is presently dead to the foreseeable future. Spartan198 17:47, 28 May 2010 UTC
I was watching The Losers, although I agree that people 4 characters all had M4A1s, they gave the impression to switch between fixed front sight and flip up/down iron sights. I wanted to ask how hard it could well be to take an M4A1, eliminate the front factory sight and replace it having a flip up/down sight. I know its pretty easy for your rear sight, but I wasnt sure in regards to the front sight. OK, I also need to ask this question because I, like some people, have played Modern Warfare 2 and seen the M4 which has a flip up/down front sight. - - Gunkatas 03:46, 28 May 2010 UTC
I believe this process would involve treatment of muzzle brake and also the existing front sight/gas block assembly and replacing it which has a gas block that's either a rail to mount the selection of front sight, or maybe a folding front sight, then reinstalling the muzzle brake. You can find instructional videos due to this process at various gunsmithing websites. Orca1 9904 14:31, 28 May 2010 UTC
Does anyone know when reloading if it's a good idea to hit the forward assist after punching the bolt release or its ok simply to start firing after striking the bolt release?
The idea behind showing up in forward assist after reloading is always to ensure the bolt is fully seated and how the weapon is just about to fire. Its generally probably not nessicary for the range, but when in the combat situation in places you might have dirt or whatnot fouling the chamber, its best if you do that to ensure which the weapon will fire when it's needed to. Orca1 9904 23:22, 28 May 2010 UTC
The M16 series will be the ONLY assault rifles except the HK G41, and that is made to be such as the M16 and it is no longer produced from the world to get a forward assist. Why dont other assault rifles use a forward assist? ie. the AK-74, G36 etc. Because other assault rifles are definitely more reliable and dont need it. :
Uh more associated using the design with the Bolt than being more reliable. The AK series possess a bolt handle attached DIRECTLY towards the bolt carrier just like many other designs. If there is debris or fouling inside the chamber which ensures you keep a round from seating properly it is possible to just jam the handle forward Ive done this inside field when my AKGarandGalilM 14etc jammed I once a tiny little bit of bark I was firing under trees which fell from above and fell in the ejection port making the round stick really badly inside the chamber then it would not seat properly. The M16 design doesn't have any way aside from the forward aid to nudge the bolt carrier forward enough to fireplace and kick that crap free with the action. But I wouldnt bash the M16 just as one unreliable rifle. Id sure go on it into battle today. MoviePropMaster2008 20:13, 23 August 2010 UTC
Alright, I understand. thanks for your extra info. Im not saying the M16/M4 is usually a complete little bit of crap, however it is definitely not the BEST ASSAULT RIFLE IN THE WORLD! like we Americans wish to state the many time rolls eyes. You and me both be aware of M16/M4 isn't a where as reliable since the G36 or AK series. But at the very least its much better than the L85 series, now thats a chunk crap rifle. :D Edit: Well at the least the L85A1, the L85A2 is OK. kinda just like the M16/M16A1s sucks however the M16A2/A4s are perfect.
I should completely disagree in what you say, i dont would like to come off as passive aggresive and you sound just like a mall ninja that learned their weapons knowledge from seeing them perform in videogames or hearing public opinions on weapons in the news or any other sources. The M16 class of rifles are generally fine and fairly reliable weapons, while most of that view may be skewed through the fact these folks were portrayed as unreliable during conflicts for instance Vietnam, is incorrect to some degree. The M16 is often a reliable and capable weapon when cleaned and properly maintained, it really lacks the cabability to stay then when not properly serviced, as other sorts of rifles such since the AKM could work fine without cleaning, the M16 are unable to. As for your comment for the L85 series, yes we were holding somewhat poor and unreliable weapons to begin with, along with poor grips and clumsy to address for certain users, though the newer designs have made large improvements and have become capable firearms. As i feel it has to be said or typed perhaps the most common mistake people make is if militaries be permitted access and funding to field their troops using the best weapons available, that's not always true as most countries do not have the money to field an Army with rifles which could cost approximately 5000-10000 per unit. Which is the spot that the workhorses like M16 s appear in, you go for your good rifle not the truly great one. Also, although off-topic it somewhat pertains to your M16, most mall ninjas assume the AK-family is much better because it can be more reliable and fires a heavier cartridge, Ive always asked could you want a round thats planning to pierce right the way through an enemy and then leave an easy to deal with wound, or use a round which hits an enemy and fragments in that person causing an ungodly bloody mess? Hopefully esteemed imfdb members for instance MPM2008 will believe and share my viewpoint regarding this subject, too as not condemn me for my long comment. Doc345 13:24, 06 March 2011 UTC
The issues of jamming throughout the Vietnam War had more regarding ammunition along with the lack of your chrome-lined chamber and barrel versus the rifles so-called dirty gas system. In 1964 the Army switched from stick powder to ball powder, which increased the speed of fire close to 1, 000 RPM and left a great deal of dirty residue inside the weapon. This was only exacerbated by the insufficient cleaning kits and training regarding how to maintain the weapon. They fixed the situation by fitting the rifle which has a buffer system which slowed the ROF down and chrome-plated chamber. Training programs in weapon maintenance were instituted as well as an instruction book on the way to maintain the rifle was circulated among troops. After further modifications resulted inside M16A1, many in the reliability issues disappeared although right now, the weapon has yet to shed its bad reputation. The M16A2, A3, A4, and M4 carbine nowadays are a fully different type of warrior as opposed to prototypes that have been issued back from the 60s. While it may admittedly be described as a bit finicky, the M16 today is often a good weapon. Spartan198 11:29, 19 June 2011 CDT
Yeah nevertheless its still a really fussy weapon, it isn't very durable, and they have much more malfunctions/jams then the H K G36, but none the less its still a wonderful weapons platform, mostly. - Mr. Wolf 14:28, 19 June 2011 CDT
I was always taught how the forward assist, while beneficial in combat, in situations where dirt or grime can jam a weapon, overall, when you DO could do with it, its a great indication of your malfunction and needs to be addressed, particularly when its in a range. Theres a video somewhere on youtube, of your guy shooting some kind of AR, and repeatedly hits the forward assist, without clearing or checking the bore, before the entire gun explodes, probably from the round hitting one stuck within the bore. - MissySummers- 18:47, 8 January 2012 CST
Are you speaking about the video the spot that the magazine blows apart during one guys AR-15 when he pulls the trigger? If so, Ive seen it although I dont recall just what the description said the source was, Im pretty sure that it was an issue using the ammunition probably a hot cartridge rather compared to oh-so-pined-upon gas system. Spartan198 03:48, 29 March 2012 CDT
One element to recollect when criticising the AR-15s reliability is that if this was first issued inside field, that it was touted never to need any maintenance nor be cleaned. Immediately, it was realised to certainly be a mistake, but that initial belief which it never needed cleaning and inevitable memory of fouling sticks around. - - Rebusdi 14:20, 14 August 2012 CDT
No, the AR-15 has never been touted as not needing maintenance or cleaning. The belief it was can be a myth, one from the many all around the weapon system. It was a knowledgeable assumption made determined by previous experiences while using AR-15s predecessor, the AR-10, which did show to be quite reliable without maintenance or cleaning I believe that it was the Sudanese who tried it in sub-Saharan Africa and gave reviews that had been nothing in short supply of glowing. Now whether AR-10s manufactured today share this trait, I do not know. Spartan198 talk 06:50, 8 January 2013 EST
When soldiers were trained on it these were told that it was pretty much self-cleaning, but do not know if i thought this was from Colt of the invention from the US Army. Although there have been cleaning kits these folks were only issued with a rate of such as 2 per platoon, as it absolutely was not believed which the weapon would need regular maintenance. When the Marines got it they no cleaning kits in any way. The parts which these folks were critically short of before the late 60s were the cleaning rods, and chamber brushes. Chamber brushes are not originally issued because chamber was stated as not requiring specific cleaning, also it wasnt until 1966 after repeated protests from in theatre officers that it absolutely was procured. Something else that's worth taking into account, is the fact instructions concerning how to clean the M16 just weren't published until I think December 1966, so until this point it turned out pretty much person to person and hearsay leading to many misconceptions for instance a great deal of troops were lubricating their ammunition, which had been a big no-no leading to lots of malfunctions with their magazines and rifles. - - commando552 talk 08:46, 8 January 2013 EST
The design-at the least the original ones-used a match grade trigger group that basically fired full auto.
If my Web Fu is correct, NSN 1005-01-562-0901 from Knights Armament.
The original, intended purpose would have been to allow the uppers for being swapped out for any short barreled model initially so a marksman could work with a short range weapon about the way in and out along with the more accurate upper with the objective.
C OTHER PERFORMANCE GOALS: 1 Increased reliability, durability, corrosion resistance, easier cleaning, lubricity/reduced friction; fully functional to get a minimum of 15, 000 rounds Threshold/30, 000 rounds Objective, performing up towards the standards and firing rates to get published inside the Solicitation, functional reliability exceeding that from the standard M4A1 carbine at high and low temperature extremes at the same time as other hostile sand/dust/dirt/mud/surf environmental conditions 2 Improved safety- delay cook-off, fail-safe features, fires/functions safely and straight away of draining within the Over-The-Beach surf zone, weapon flooded with water environment. 3 User Acceptance: operational suitability, increased live-fire hit scores, decreased live-fire engagement times, speed/accuracy of engagement, controllability in semi-automatic and full automatic fire, improved handling qualities, lightweight, snag free in movement through vegetation and battlefield obstacles. Accent added
Does the Army issue regular infantry 4th Inf. Div. the three-round burst M4 or even the M4A1? I always thought it had been the M4A1 and please forgive me if I got towards the party late, but from what Ive read, it looks like they issue the regulars the Model 920, leaving the 921 for Special Forces along with the like. -
i think all this depends within the on-base armory. as an example some armorys might still involve some M4s. on the other hand think a normal infantry does makes use of the M4A1. however. Special forces dont make use of the M4A1 or even the M4. they make use of the hK416/417. Dirtdiver6421 17:11, 2 August 2010 UTC
Though I do not know for certain, I wouldnt imply Spec-Ops units use only the modern HK rifles - As youve said, everthing depends on whats around, and with a degree what are the soldiers prefer from the case of Special units. Though the aforementioned HK rifles are usually in inventory, that doesnt automatically cancel the M4s out - some personnel might still use em. Plus there are many weapons around, namely the FN SCAR series. Though I would agree use from the M4 with Special Forces probably isnt as common nowadays.
As for just a regular-issue weapon, I agree how the M4 and M4A1 are in use nowadays, with all the A1 perhaps being more prominent. StanTheMan 19:40, 2 August 2010 UTC
Actually, Stan, my understanding is that is opposite. The M4 may be the most common version, not the M4A1. military doctrine still discourages full-auto for infantry rifles, in order that it seems unlikely to me the M4A1 is gonna be more usual. As to the SCAR, SOCOM just decided last June which they werent gonna order any longer SCAR-Ls for that foreseeable future, which means even amongst most SF units, the M4 will stay their standard weapon. - MT2008 01:11, 3 August 2010 UTC
Well, I wasnt too sure, but I estimate that does add up to stick together with the burst-fire M4. Good point. StanTheMan 01:51, 3 August 2010 UTC
The only SF unit that utilizes the M4 920 that I can think of would be the Asymmetric Warfare Group, but thats only cause that they had to hand into their HK416s. According with a book Ive got, that decision went over such as a lead balloon using the AWG. -
thank god. im not a large fan from the SCAR-L i've found it pointless. in case you want to go having a new alternative towards the M4/M16. why the hell do you take an unfamiliar weapon. alas the hK416. same rate of fire. same Picatanny rail, same attachments, same stock, same barrel, same trigger group, and very similiar internals. and Stan, i really do agree. if i managed to make it sounds like all SF utilize the hK416, i didnt mean to. i/we really DONT no what you all use. they pick their very own. they may carry an AK-47 or even a CAR-15 should they wanted to. we cant make generalizations about units which get custom made equipment. Dirtdiver6421 20:07, 3 August 2010 UTC
No prob, dude - Im just glad you still have what I was gettin at. StanTheMan 20:56, 3 August 2010 UTC
i could be shocked when they couldnt pick their weapons. their the very best soldiers around the planet. it merely doesnt add up not to get able to. it could be like giving a star baseball player a 10 dollar glove. itll do but why wouldnt they have the best thats around. Dirtdiver6421 01:52, 4 August 2010 UTC
Reg army units utilize the burst M4, not the total auto A1. Spartan198 05:10, 4 August 2010 UTC
A few months ago when I was at the military base there have been Marines conducting a weapons demo while using M4 carbine. It was the 3-round burst rifle, but a matter came up regarding the M4A1. One Marine said that they can got lessen all M4A1s simply have M4s. I personally dont begin to see the need for just a full-auto rifle and 3-round burst is okay because it forces anyone to decelerate and most in the time an individual uses semi-only, combat or you cannot, but that's my opinion. The M4A1 is probabley used with the US Military, but Im undecided, I havent seen one in the long time.- MarineCorps1 23:29, 21 July 2011 CDT
From what I hear, the Army is thinking about replacing every full-size M16 and original M4 together with the M4A1 by 2014; dunno how thatll exercise. Kadorhal talk 04:18, 2 March 2013 EST
I believe has more to do with all the trigger pull than fire modes. Ive heard the burst trigger is shyte, though Im not familiar with all the technical side from it ATM. Spartan198 talk 08:04, 5 March 2013 EST
After seeing several pages of real firearms appearing in a mere one film or game, I wanted to ask if I should expand this page having a new section with the Colt Accurized Rifle, which to my knowledge only has ever appeared in 4. Before I make it happen, I need to confirm 2 things:
Is the Colt Accurized Rifle indeed another variant about the M16 distinctive line of rifles, or a different take within the AR-15 design altogether? I suppose theres a answer why we dont add some Z-M LR 300 within the M16 page because is latter-I have to know if the Colt Accurized Rifle falls as category.
Including it about this page makes it the very first Designated Marksman Rifle variant here. So far I only see assault rifles or carbines here. Would including a DMR in these pages be a problem or otherwise not?
If there isn't any real problems, Ill make a different section for doing this, but I don't know where Ill obtain a non-copyright infringment image of just one. - - Mazryonh 01:44, 13 August 2010 UTC
Thanks for your info, but tend to someone confirm that this Colt Accurized Rifle should indeed be descended in the M16 distinctive line of assault rifles and not an outside take about the AR-15 design such as aforementioned LR-300 is? I still don't know where I can receive a photo on this DMR that respects copyright. All I have are game screenshots. Some help here, please? - - Mazryonh 22:47, 24 August 2010 UTC
Not to be a production gun Colts website cannot make mention of just one, anyway, though the modular nature from the AR system makes this sort of configuration totally possible. Spartan198 14:46, 14 November 2010 UTC
The guns look exactly the same, sure the SP1 stood a design improvement in 1978 three prong flash hider was changed to birdcage, rear sling swivel was changed to A1 style and also the color went from greenish grey to straight grey but unless we start to see the stamp about the side saying Property of Government we cant determine if its a true M16 which WERE sold via Title II dealers to armories as well as a Colt AR15 SP1 which was transformed into full auto which had been done A LOT before 1986. MoviePropMaster2008 19:10, 30 January 2011 UTC
Am wanting to pin down that of a gun is for a webpage Im focusing on. It incorporates a forward assist but no deflector, A1 rear sight, M4 length tubular handguard, 16 barrel with birdcage flash hider as well as a solid stock. Basically it matches the gun inside picture for that Model 653 about the main page, in addition to having a solid stock but that's easily changeable. However, every source I can find regarding the 653 says that it's got a 14 barrel. Was the gun manufactured in different barrel lengths but kept the identical designation, of course, if not, anyone know exactly what the gun is that is certainly pictured to be a 653? Also, while Im around the topic of obscure colt carbines, does anyone know of your model that could match a 725 original C8 with no flat-top but posseses an A2 rear sight? Thanks, - - commando552 18:16, 16 April 2011 CDT
I found this hidden within my computer, I think its a Colt Canada C7A1 like a base, I can tell its C7 because on the Canadian leaf within the the lower receiver, it could well be an A1 because from the removable carrying-handle. What the heck is the fact hand-guard? - Mr. Wolf 01:02, 28 April 2011 CDT
Colt Model 750/Diemaco C7 Light Support Weapon - A modified C7 with the enlarged gas tube hence the square handguard plus a heavy barrel for sustained fire inside the squad automatic weapon role. The C7 LSW is not used through the Canadian Forces but has seen service with all the Dutch and Danish militaries. - - Markit 01:34, 28 April 2011 CDT
Ha! I thought so, thanks. : Should I remove it or ensure that it stays. - Mr. Wolf 13:53, 28 April 2011 CDT
Thats not Colt LSW, thats Colt Automatic Rifle. Follow the link therefore you will see how the image may be the larger version on the official one. Meanwhile, Colt LSW has optional folding carry handle. - - Masterius 09:09, 29 April 2011 CDT
Just to clarify, the Colt automatic rifle, LSW and LMG are the many same weapon. The original version that looks much like the one above was the Colt Model 750, which featured a limited A2 carry handle and barrel mounted bi-pod, along with the newer version above may be the current production Model 950, using the relocated bi-pod and A4 rear sights. As you said, the folding carry handle is removeable, plus the picture about the Colt website is definitely one without fitted note the longer centre vent about the top on the handguard may be the mounting point for your handle. - - commando552 02:48, 1 May 2011 CDT
Guys, remember back inside the 1980s when Colt was looking to vie to the SAW role? Sure the FN Minimi was not ever knocked off its perch, but Colt came out which has a Colt light Machine gun that looked lots like this. They were selling the barreled uppers about the market to get a while inside early 1990s I know a couple of friends who've them, but I never got one. This looks like this reincarnated!!! LOL! MoviePropMaster2008 15:24, 29 April 2011 CDT
Ah yes, you simply read about it monkeyboy ; I was handling and firing that sucker! LOL MoviePropMaster2008 03:11, 1 May 2011 CDT
Oh, and Ive found articles of why AR is much more advantageous than SAW to US Marine Corps:
Not overall, its the role they can be being utilised in automatic rifleman. SAW remains very good in defensive role and laying fire on attacking forces ; - - Masterius 11:33, 1 May 2011 CDT
I wanted to ask, does anyone determine what kind of effects the cuts originally meant for that mounting with the M203 grenade launcher inside barrel in the M4 and similiarly-styled M16 AR-15 series carbines has around the heat dissipation performance on the barrel? Do the cuts conserve the weapon release heat from prolonged firing a lot better than a barrel which includes a uniform thickness, or would it hamper that? Any input now you may provide for this would be greatly appreciated. Orca1 9904 17:46, 8 May 2011 CDT
The step down for that grenade launcher is definitely pretty negligible with regard to cooling even though it does develop a point of weakness to bending, as everything you cant see would be the fact that as soon because the barrel goes beneath the handguard it really is reduced down towards the same narrow diameter as inside the cut out, which generates a much bigger impact on cooling. The narrower profile sections possess the effect of cooling off the barrel quicker, in addition they conversely mean that this barrel gets hotter quicker, and also the heat includes a larger effect about the accuracy with the gun. The main advantage however is the fact that it lessens the weight a great deal. The original reason how the M4 barrel reduces bigger behind the handguard is based around the M16A2, which does exactly the same principle where its heavy barrel will be only thicker in the evening front sight. This was due to some cock up inside design, where they designed the gun that has a full thickness straight barrel, and found which they could then will no longer clamp the M203 on the barrel, and so the barrels were simply refused from behind leading sight post. The front on the barrel remained thick due to your fact how the thinner barrels about the M16A1 were being bent in the front from getting used as pry-bars to receive the loading bands from shipping pallets. - - commando552 04:53, 6 June 2011 CDT
There is often a heavier SOCOM-profile barrel that maintains precisely the same diameter below the handguards because the standard M4-profile barrel does throughout the M203 cut and yes it can mount the M203 perfectly. 2 Spartan198 11:40, 19 June 2011 CDT
sorry i truly do not possess a pic however can tell you what on earth is like. me and my pops were talikng about some from the guns he found in the army and the man was telling me about that one he said was such as an carbine version on the m16a2 also it was much like the m4 but stood a fixed carring handle and it had been used befor the m4 it had safe semi and burst and that he said it had ar15 for the side.-Steviebleckley
Sounds such as the first batch of M4s which were delivered. This will be the Colt Model 777, and that is basically an M4 which has a fixed carry handle, and 3-round burst compared to full auto. It will be the brother of and visually identical towards the 727 mentioned within the main page, the location where the 727 as full auto as opposed towards the burst. If it didnt develop the M4 profile barrel though, god knows. Probably a model 654 upon an M16 lower receiver or something like that. - - commando552 15:02, 13 June 2011 CDT
yes it had exactly the same profile as being the m4. i gess it turned out the 777.I will show him the pic with the the 727 since there exactly the same well the 727 is full auto thanks for your info - Steviebleckley
Im it's unlikely that any hundred percent sure just what it does, and such as forward assist that hardly any other guns get it. If someone could just clarify, what would it do, how come this rifle series are, and why dont others/what replaces the buffer tube in other rifles? Thank you ahead of time. - - Rebusdi 07:27, 12 July 2011 CDT
Basically, that it was installed in order to slow down the pace of fire. The very first M16s found themselves using a different ammunition powder than these were designed for, which caused a higher rate of fire than desired about 800 to 1000 rpm I think, bringing about excessive fouling inside the chamber, so because of this lots of stopages. From the M16E1 onwards a buffer tube was included in slow the incidence of fire to about 600-700 rpm, as well as a chrome lined chamber and barrel was added also. - - commando552 11:47, 12 July 2011 CDT
Im not sure if it is practical in any respect, and even possible, but is the a way to increase the pace of fire by using an M16 devoid of the problems on the carbon build-up within the chamber?- MarineCorps1 23:29, 21 July 2011 CDT
Why would you would like to increase the interest rate of fire? - Mr. Wolf 00:40, 22 July 2011 CDT
No reason, just wondering whether it is even possible having a full-auto M16.- MarineCorps1 08:09, 22 July 2011 CDT